Misleading
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
Misleading
  • About Us
  • Log in
  • Don’t Mislead (Archive)
  • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
Misleading
No Result
View All Result

Free COVID tests are back. But there are more accurate tests for sale.

September 26, 2024
in Missleading
Reading Time: 5 mins read
0 0
A A
0
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Manufacturers of the most accurate home COVID-19 tests on the market say they were left out again from the Biden administration’s latest round of free orders through COVIDTests.gov, which for a seventh time will rely on less sensitive “antigen” tests, which are generally the cheaper options available on drugstore shelves.

Federal health officials have justified the millions they have spent on device manufacturers for the latest waves as critical to subsidizing U.S. factories capable of producing tests ahead of another potential pandemic, during a time when demand has evaporated. 

Taxpayer dollars have flowed largely towards manufacturers of inexpensive rapid antigen tests like Access Bio in New Jersey and iHealth in California, instead of more accurate “molecular” alternatives that the Food and Drug Administration has also greenlighted.

A spokesperson for the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response, which awarded the contracts, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

What are the most accurate home tests for COVID-19?

The FDA currently has granted authorization to only four over-the-counter molecular test brands for COVID-19, which are the most accurate but also most expensive options:

  • Lucira by Pfizer sells a single-use test that has the cheapest up-front cost, starting at $39.99, which detects both COVID-19 as well as influenza. The FDA says results take around 30 minutes and the shelf life of each test lasts 18 months. 
  • Aptitude Medical Systems sells a “starter bundle” which comes with a reusable reader and two test kits for $99.97. The FDA says results take around 30 minutes and the shelf life of the tests last around 18 months. Additional test kits cost $24.99.
  • 3EO Health sells a “starter kit” that comes with a reusable testing device and two swabs for $195. The FDA says results take around 30 minutes and the shelf life of the tests last four months. Additional swabs and “test keys” cost $39.90 for a two-pack.
  • Cue Health sells a reusable “reader” that costs $199. Test kits are currently out of stock on the company’s website. The FDA says results take around 20 minutes and the shelf life of the tests last around four months. 

These prices are many times higher than antigen testing options, though device manufacturers say COVID-19 tests are generally eligible for flexible spending account or health savings account dollars and could be reimbursable under some health insurance plans.

Results from using a molecular test take longer because the devices need to create chemical reactions to amplify any traces of the virus that might be otherwise missed by less accurate tests.

That translates to an advertised sensitivity – their accuracy in correctly spotting infections – up to more than 90%, even when people do not have symptoms from the virus. 

By contrast, the FDA warns that Americans relying on antigen tests should be prepared to use up multiple kits if they worry they might be infected.

Since antigen options have a higher risk of producing a false negative result, especially early during an infection, the agency says people should continue to repeat their testing over several days after their first negative test.

This difference is important early during a course of a COVID-19 infection, when the CDC says people tend to be most contagious. The highest amount of infectious virus is detected from patients “within a few days before and after” symptoms begin.

The CDC says in its latest guidance that testing negative on antigen tests can still be a useful “option” for helping to judge when it is safer to stop isolating at the tail end of an infection, offering a “rough approximation of whether a person is still infectious” to others.

What brands of antigen tests are being shipped by COVIDTests.gov?

COVID-19 antigen test manufacturers told CBS News that they are still delivering kits via COVIDTests.gov through contracts that were awarded last year to a dozen manufacturers.

Of them, a handful of testing brands have been able to earn the FDA’s “traditional marketing authorization” to continue to sell their tests in the wake of the pandemic as emergency authorities wind down, including:

  • CorDx sells two-packs for $14.99 that offers results in 10 minutes
  • iHealth Labs sells two-packs for $17.98 that offers results in 15 minutes
  • InBios International sells two-packs for $8.50 that offers results in 20 minutes
  • Quidel Corporation sells two-packs for $16.99 that offers results in 10 minutes

Other tests remain under emergency use authorization, including OraSure’s InteliSwab kit. That “more accessible” test is being shipped through the Administration for Community Living again this year for free to Americans who are blind or who have low vision.

While less accurate than molecular tests, ASPR says their antigen tests this year will continue to be able to “detect the currently circulating COVID-19 variants.”

Coronavirus Pandemic


More


More

Alexander Tin

Alexander Tin is a digital reporter for CBS News based in the Washington, D.C. bureau. He covers the Biden administration’s public health agencies, including the federal response to infectious disease outbreaks like COVID-19.

Previous Post

Millennials on Their Platonic Relationships: ‘We Are Very Happy With Life’

Next Post

How to get a 6% (or lower) mortgage rate right now

Related Posts

It Would be Misleading to Think This Wasn’t One of the Greatest Physical Feats in Modern History
Don’t Mislead

It Would be Misleading to Think This Wasn’t One of the Greatest Physical Feats in Modern History

January 30, 2026
Don’t Mislead — If Everything Looks Real, How Do We Know What Isn’t? 
Don’t Mislead

Don’t Mislead — If Everything Looks Real, How Do We Know What Isn’t? 

January 18, 2026
Missleading

Why do people who are educated fall for conspiracy theories and rumors? Could it be narcissism?

January 13, 2026
New Food Pyramid Drops, Old One Quietly Admits It Was Misleading Millions. Dr Berg explains.
Don’t Mislead

New Food Pyramid Drops, Old One Quietly Admits It Was Misleading Millions. Dr Berg explains.

January 12, 2026
Your Food Isn’t ‘Expired’ — But the Labels Might Be Misleading You 
Don’t Mislead

Your Food Isn’t ‘Expired’ — But the Labels Might Be Misleading You 

January 3, 2026
Stressed About Holiday Flights? That’s Exactly How Fraudsters Mislead You
Don’t Mislead

Stressed About Holiday Flights? That’s Exactly How Fraudsters Mislead You

December 30, 2025
Next Post

How to get a 6% (or lower) mortgage rate right now

Putin Has Redrawn His Nuclear Red Line. How Will NATO Respond?

Please login to join discussion
Misleading

Misleading is your trusted source for uncovering fake news, analyzing misinformation, and educating readers about deceptive media tactics. Join the fight for truth today!

TRENDING

It Would be Misleading to Think This Wasn’t One of the Greatest Physical Feats in Modern History

LATEST

It Would be Misleading to Think This Wasn’t One of the Greatest Physical Feats in Modern History

Don’t Mislead — If Everything Looks Real, How Do We Know What Isn’t? 

Why do people who are educated fall for conspiracy theories and rumors? Could it be narcissism?

  • About Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Misleading.
Misleading is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • About Us
  • Log in
  • Don’t Mislead (Archive)
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Misleading.
Misleading is not responsible for the content of external sites.