After an investigation into Joe Biden’s mental state and his use of autopens, the House Oversight Committee published a report.
In the report, it is stated that “in the absence of sufficient contemporaneous documents indicating that a cognitively declining President Biden made a particular executive decision, these decisions should not be considered valid.”
James Comer (R-Ky.), Chair of the House Oversight Committee, has demanded that the Department of Justice conduct an “intense” investigation into Joe Biden’s use of autopens.
…
The report stated that “White House aides, under the direction of inner circle, hid the truth regarding the condition of former President Joe Biden and his fitness to hold office.”
The committee also cited a “haphazard documenting process” in the report for the pardons granted by Biden. This, they argued, left doubt as to whether or not the former president had made these decisions himself.
The GOP report stated that “in the absence of sufficient contemporaneous documents indicating that a cognitively declining President Biden made a particular executive decision, such actions do not have the force of law. They should be considered null and void.”
The letter requested that the DOJ investigate three Biden assistants who invoked Fifth Amendment.
The letter asked the Justice Department to investigate further three Biden White House aides, including former White House physician Kevin O’Connor and Biden aides Anthony Bernal & Annie Tomasini who refused to testify before the committee.
The Fifth Amendment is usually invoked to avoid answering certain questions. Although it may be perceived as a way to avoid accountability by the public, the US Supreme Court regards the right against self incrimination as an important part of the Constitution. In legal proceedings, they have tried to ensure that the silence of a witness is not viewed as proof of guilt.
The Committee wrote to the Board of Medicine in Washington, DC, requesting it to investigate whether O’Connor should be disciplined for “issuing false medical reports, misrepresenting treatment, failing to comply with standards of practice, and other acts of violations of District of Columbia Law regulating licensed doctors.”
