The liabilities of claiming “clean coal” include misleading perceptions about its environmental impact, as the process still emits significant carbon dioxide. The term also downplays complications like the disposal of toxic coal ash and the underdevelopment of carbon capture and storage technologies, potentially leading to continued reliance on fossil fuels instead of promoting sustainable energy alternatives. No real quick fix there, huh?
Environmental groups, climate scientists, and renewable energy advocates often stand against “clean coal” due to emissions and environmental issues. Prominent voices include Greenpeace, the Sierra Club, and influential figures like Al Gore and Bill McKibben. It’s a hot topic!
Supporters argue it can reduce carbon emissions with new tech, preserve jobs in coal industries, and serve as a bridge towards more sustainable energy sources. Tough balancing act, though.
Sounds Misleading to many, what’s your view.
