Misleading
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
Misleading
  • About Us
  • Log in
  • Don’t Mislead (Archive)
  • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
Misleading
No Result
View All Result

Fact Check: Trump Boasts About Nonexistent New York Times Election Apology

October 11, 2024
in Missleading
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0 0
A A
0
Fact Check: Trump Boasts About Nonexistent New York Times Election Apology
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

With the presidential race between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris tightening, the former president has begun drawing parallels between this year’s contest and his 2016 win against Hillary Clinton.

After Harris enjoyed a honeymoon campaign introduction, pollsters are narrowing the gap between the two candidates, as a recent Newsweek analysis has shown.

At a rally in Scranton, Pennsylvania, this week, while discussing his polling position, Trump said that the “failing” New York Times had been forced to issue an apology to its readers after he won the presidential race in 2016.

Donald Trump
Former President Donald Trump at a rally in Scranton, Pennsylvania, on October 9. Trump claimed at the rally that the New York Times apologized to readers after he won in 2016.
Former President Donald Trump at a rally in Scranton, Pennsylvania, on October 9. Trump claimed at the rally that the New York Times apologized to readers after he won in 2016.
Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

The Claim

At a rally in Scranton, Pennsylvania, held on October 9, 2024, Trump said: “The only place we’re down, New York Times has a headline that we’re down a little bit, but they’re the only poll. Every poll, you got to see these polls they’re the best polls, New York Times, as we call it, the failing New York Times, it’s fake news, these people are sick.

“You remember in 2016 they had to do an editorial apologizing to their readers because they said he’s ‘Going to lose, he’s going to lose, I swear he’s going to lose,’ and then I won, and they lost thousands and thousands of…I love that. Can that happen again?”

The Facts

This did not happen. The New York Times did not issue an apology editorial after the 2016 election, and there’s no evidence that any such editorial led to a loss of “thousands” in what we may assume is readers or income. It is not clear what Trump has based that part of his claim on.

After the 2016 election results, the paper published a letter about the “unconventionality” of Trump’s campaign and what was an “erratic and unpredictable election.”

Principally, the letter was about how it would continue in its work after the results.

“As we reflect on the momentous result, and the months of reporting and polling that preceded it, we aim to rededicate ourselves to the fundamental mission of Times journalism,” it read.

“That is to report America and the world honestly, without fear or favor, striving always to understand and reflect all political perspectives and life experiences in the stories that we bring to you.”

The Times had printed predictions ahead of the results that Clinton had an 85 percent chance of winning. While Clinton won the popular vote, Trump easily secured the 270 Electoral College votes to take the presidency.

The letter is still online and does not contain any apology or admission of wrongdoing as Trump suggests.

Newsweek reached out to Trump’s team for comment.

This wasn’t the only misleading claim Trump made during his visit to Pennsylvania. The former president grossly overestimated how many people turned up to his return to the Butler Farm Show grounds, the site of his assassination attempt in July.

Trump claimed to have attracted 100,000 people, but Newsweek’s analysis shows that, based on modeling and expert testimony, the number had to have been lower than 57,000.

The Ruling

False

False.

The New York Times did not apologize to its readers after Trump won the presidential election in 2016. The paper wrote an editorial addressing the “unpredictable election” and its goal of maintaining journalistic integrity. The claim that this editorial cost the paper “thousands” in either readers or income is unevidenced.

FACT CHECK BY Newsweek’s Fact Check team

Previous Post

Moment Rescue Dog Realizes She Still Has a Home After Returning From Kennel

Next Post

Gender Becoming Biggest Voting Indicator Sparks Concern

Related Posts

Don’t Mislead: Sheriff Chris Nanos Says He’s Focused on the Guthrie Investigation… Yet He’s Spotted Courtside on Saturday Night
Don’t Mislead

Don’t Mislead: Sheriff Chris Nanos Says He’s Focused on the Guthrie Investigation… Yet He’s Spotted Courtside on Saturday Night

February 9, 2026
Don’t Mislead: When Even Costco’s Chicken Label Needs a Fact‑Check
Don’t Mislead

Don’t Mislead: When Even Costco’s Chicken Label Needs a Fact‑Check

February 4, 2026
It Would be Misleading to Think This Wasn’t One of the Greatest Physical Feats in Modern History
Don’t Mislead

It Would be Misleading to Think This Wasn’t One of the Greatest Physical Feats in Modern History

January 30, 2026
Don’t Mislead — If Everything Looks Real, How Do We Know What Isn’t? 
Don’t Mislead

Don’t Mislead — If Everything Looks Real, How Do We Know What Isn’t? 

January 18, 2026
Missleading

Why do people who are educated fall for conspiracy theories and rumors? Could it be narcissism?

January 13, 2026
New Food Pyramid Drops, Old One Quietly Admits It Was Misleading Millions. Dr Berg explains.
Don’t Mislead

New Food Pyramid Drops, Old One Quietly Admits It Was Misleading Millions. Dr Berg explains.

January 12, 2026
Next Post
‘The View’ Pushes Back on Obama’s Message to Black Men

Gender Becoming Biggest Voting Indicator Sparks Concern

Donald Trump Floats Tax Breaks for Generators After Deadly Hurricanes

Donald Trump Floats Tax Breaks for Generators After Deadly Hurricanes

Please login to join discussion
Misleading

Misleading is your trusted source for uncovering fake news, analyzing misinformation, and educating readers about deceptive media tactics. Join the fight for truth today!

TRENDING

Don’t Mislead: Sheriff Chris Nanos Says He’s Focused on the Guthrie Investigation… Yet He’s Spotted Courtside on Saturday Night

LATEST

Don’t Mislead: Sheriff Chris Nanos Says He’s Focused on the Guthrie Investigation… Yet He’s Spotted Courtside on Saturday Night

Don’t Mislead: When Even Costco’s Chicken Label Needs a Fact‑Check

It Would be Misleading to Think This Wasn’t One of the Greatest Physical Feats in Modern History

  • About Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Misleading.
Misleading is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • About Us
  • Log in
  • Don’t Mislead (Archive)
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Misleading.
Misleading is not responsible for the content of external sites.