Nissan’s Engine Recall Marks Latest Breakdown in Ongoing Corporate Troubles
Editorial by Contributor Brian S
In the summer of 2025, Nissan quietly initiated one of the largest safety recalls in its recent history, affecting over 440,000 vehicles across the United States. The issue? A manufacturing defect in the engine bearings of its VC-Turbo engines—an innovation once heralded as a breakthrough in fuel efficiency and performance. Now, that same technology is at the center of a crisis that threatens not only consumer trust but the credibility of Nissan’s engineering ambitions.
The recall spans several models: the 2021–2024 Nissan Rogue, 2019–2020 Altima, 2019–2022 Infiniti QX50, and the 2022 Infiniti QX55. All are equipped with either the 1.5L three-cylinder or 2.0L four-cylinder VC-Turbo engines. These engines were designed to adapt compression ratios dynamically, offering a balance between power and efficiency. But beneath the marketing gloss, something went wrong. Nissan disclosed that the engine bearings may have manufacturing defects that could lead to total engine failure. In some cases, the defect has reportedly caused engine fires, though no injuries have been confirmed to date.
The defect itself is not instantaneous. Bearing failures tend to progress over time, offering drivers a series of warning signs: abnormal engine noises, rough running, dashboard warning lights, and even burning smells. But the gradual nature of the failure doesn’t make it any less dangerous. A sudden loss of motive power at highway speeds can be catastrophic. And for a company like Nissan, which has spent years positioning itself as a leader in safety and innovation, the implications are profound.
What makes this recall particularly unsettling is the scale and timing. Over 1,000 warranty claims have already been filed, and the recall was announced just days before the July 4th weekend—a peak travel period for American families. Social media platforms lit up with frustrated owners sharing stories of stalled vehicles, delayed repairs, and conflicting dealership guidance. The recall notice promises free inspections and repairs, including full engine replacements if necessary. But for many, the damage—both mechanical and reputational—has already been done.
The VC-Turbo engine was supposed to be Nissan’s moonshot. Developed over years and introduced with much fanfare, it represented a bold attempt to redefine internal combustion in an era increasingly dominated by electric vehicles. The idea was elegant: vary the compression ratio on the fly to optimize performance or fuel economy depending on driving conditions. It was a technological marvel, but also a mechanical gamble. Variable compression requires complex linkages, precise tolerances, and flawless manufacturing. A single defect in a bearing—especially one supporting the crankshaft—can cascade into catastrophic failure.
And that’s exactly what happened. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the defect lies in the crankshaft rod bearings. These components are critical to engine operation, and their failure can result in metal debris circulating through the oil system, damaging other parts and ultimately causing the engine to seize. Nissan’s remedy involves inspecting the oil pan for debris and replacing the engine if necessary. For vehicles without debris, a software update and oil change may suffice. But the fact that engine replacement is even on the table underscores the severity of the issue.
From a consumer perspective, the recall raises uncomfortable questions. How did such a fundamental defect escape Nissan’s quality control? Why did it take years—and hundreds of thousands of vehicles—for the company to act? And what does this say about the broader reliability of VC-Turbo technology? These are not just technical questions; they are questions of trust. When a company sells a vehicle, it’s not just selling metal and rubber—it’s selling peace of mind. And when that peace is shattered, the consequences ripple far beyond the service bay.
There’s also a speculative dimension to consider. Nissan’s recall comes at a time when the automotive industry is undergoing seismic shifts. Electric vehicles are gaining market share, regulatory scrutiny is intensifying, and consumer expectations are evolving. In this context, the VC-Turbo engine was a bridge—a way to offer improved efficiency without abandoning internal combustion entirely. But now, that bridge looks shaky. If Nissan’s flagship engine can fail so dramatically, what does that mean for other transitional technologies? Are we witnessing the twilight of combustion innovation, hastened not by regulation but by mechanical fragility?
It’s tempting to view the recall as a one-off—a regrettable but isolated incident. But history suggests otherwise. Automotive recalls often reveal deeper systemic issues: supply chain vulnerabilities, design oversights, or corporate cultures that prioritize speed over scrutiny. In Nissan’s case, the defect appears to stem from manufacturing inconsistencies in the engine bearings. But the fact that these inconsistencies persisted across multiple model years and engine types suggests a broader lapse in oversight. Whether that lapse occurred in design, production, or quality assurance remains unclear. What is clear is that over 440,000 vehicles are now potential liabilities.
The recall also exposes the tension between innovation and reliability. The VC-Turbo engine was a bold bet, and bold bets carry risk. But in the automotive world, risk must be managed meticulously. A failed engine is not just a mechanical inconvenience—it’s a safety hazard. And when that hazard affects hundreds of thousands of vehicles, it becomes a public issue. Regulators, insurers, and consumers all have a stake in the outcome. Nissan’s response—free repairs, transparent communication, and a commitment to safety—is commendable. But it’s also reactive. The real test will be whether the company can prevent similar failures in future technologies.
For Nissan and Infiniti owners, the path forward is clear but inconvenient. Check your VIN, schedule an inspection, and hope for the best. If your engine needs replacement, brace for delays. If it doesn’t, monitor for symptoms. And if you’re considering a new vehicle, ask hard questions about the technology under the hood. Innovation is exciting, but reliability is essential. The VC-Turbo engine promised both. This recall suggests it delivered only one.
In the end, the Nissan recall is more than a technical bulletin—it’s a cautionary tale. It reminds us that even the most sophisticated engineering can falter, that even the most trusted brands can stumble. It challenges us to look beyond the brochure and ask: What’s really driving this car? And it invites automakers to reflect on the balance between ambition and accountability. Because in the race for innovation, the finish line is not just performance—it’s trust
Thank for joining us at Misleading.com
