Misleading
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
Misleading
  • About Us
  • Log in
  • Don’t Mislead (Archive)
  • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
Misleading
No Result
View All Result

Missouri Execution of Marcellus Williams Creates Rare Supreme Court Divide

September 24, 2024
in Missleading
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0 0
A A
0
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Marcellus Williams’ death penalty case pitted liberal Supreme Court justices against conservative justices and the divide among the court is something rarely seen in requests for stays of execution.

Williams’ 2001 murder conviction was called into question bythe current prosecuting attorney for St. Louis County, Missouri, who questioned if the 55-year-old’s constitutional rights were violated. The victim’s family also opposed his execution and Williams hoped for a last-minute stay from the Supreme Court halting his execution, something the court has only granted once this term.

Hours before Williams’ execution in Missouri was set to take place, the Supreme Court denied a petition to stay his execution. Supreme Court Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson would have granted the request, although, they did not make note of why.

The Supreme Court has ruled on nearly 30 death penalty stays in the last term and were united in their opinions in all but three cases, including Williams’. On Friday, the Supreme Court denied Freddie Owens’ request to stay his execution, but Sotomayor said she would have granted it. Days before the 46-year-old’s execution, a key witness, Steven Golden, told the South Carolina Supreme Court that he lied on the stand.

“I thought the real shooter or his associates might kill me if I named him to the police,” Golden said in a court filing.

marcellus williams supreme court missouri execution
The U.S. Supreme Court is seen on a hot, summer day on August 27, 2024, in Washington, DC. This photo provided by the Missouri Department of Corrections shows Marcellus Williams. The Supreme Court rejected Williams’…
The U.S. Supreme Court is seen on a hot, summer day on August 27, 2024, in Washington, DC. This photo provided by the Missouri Department of Corrections shows Marcellus Williams. The Supreme Court rejected Williams’ request to stay his execution on Tuesday.

Kevin Carter/Getty Images/Missouri Department of Corrections

Owens wasn’t even at the convenience store when Irene Graves, a clerk, was fatally shot in 1997, according to Golden, a co-defendant in the case. South Carolina Supreme Court rejected requests to stay his execution, calling recanted testimony “among the least reliable evidence.” Owens died by lethal injection on Friday night.

In October, the Supreme Court agreed to vacate a stay of execution for Jedidiah Murphy, a Texas man convicted of the 2000 fatal shooting of 80-year-old Bertie Lee Cunningham. Murphy challenged the DNA testing of evidence used to convict him at his 2001 trial and the 5th Circuit of Appeals upheld a federal judge’s order delaying the execution. However, the Texas attorney general appealed the ruling to the Supreme Court, which sided in Texas’ favor and overturned the lower court’s stay, allowing the execution to proceed.

Sotomayor, Kagan and Jackson all disagreed with the majority of the court, and said they would have denied the application to overturn the stay.

It’s extremely rare for the Supreme Court to grant a stay of execution and has only happened once this term. In July, the Court granted a last-minute stay for Ruben Gutierrez, who was convicted in 1999 for killing an elderly woman in Texas during a robbery. He argues that DNA testing would prove he wasn’t involved in her murder. The Supreme Court previously halted his execution in 2020, as well.

Williams was convicted of killing Felicia Gayle, a former reporter for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch on August 11, 1998. Williams’ DNA didn’t match forensic evidence that was found at the crime scene and he maintains he’s innocent. His attorneys argued that the witnesses used to convict him are unreliable and in 2017, former Missouri Governor Eric Greitens appointed a board of inquiry to investigate Williams’ DNA claims.

However, when Governor Mike Parson came into office in 2023, he disbanded the board before it could issue its final report and the attorney general set a new execution date for Williams.

“We could stall and delay for another six years, deferring justice, leaving a victim’s family in limbo, and solving nothing,” Parson said in June 2023. “This administration won’t do that.”

Previous Post

Anna Delvey Addresses Comment About Her Ankle Monitor

Next Post

What Georgia Ballot Decision Could Mean for Donald Trump: Analysts

Related Posts

“Anchor It”, It’s Misleading To Think You Don’t Have To Anchor Your TV’s And Furniture
Don’t Mislead

“Anchor It”, It’s Misleading To Think You Don’t Have To Anchor Your TV’s And Furniture

March 16, 2026
That Viral CEO Big Arch Bite: A Masterclass in Trying Not to Mislead While Looking Uninspired
Don’t Mislead

That Viral CEO Big Arch Bite: A Masterclass in Trying Not to Mislead While Looking Uninspired

March 6, 2026
Vince McMahon Crash Footage Goes Viral, but the Misleading Commentary Goes Nuclear
Don’t Mislead

Vince McMahon Crash Footage Goes Viral, but the Misleading Commentary Goes Nuclear

March 1, 2026
Chuck Todd explains the FCC’s Equal‑Time Rule — and why the new media economy runs on grievances, not airtime.
Don’t Mislead

Chuck Todd explains the FCC’s Equal‑Time Rule — and why the new media economy runs on grievances, not airtime.

February 20, 2026
Dr. Hillary Cass — Social Media Is Over‑Labeling Kids Before They Even Understand Themselves
Don’t Mislead

Dr. Hillary Cass — Social Media Is Over‑Labeling Kids Before They Even Understand Themselves

February 19, 2026
Brian Entin: “The sheriff blocked the FBI — and sent DNA to Florida instead of Quantico”
Don’t Mislead

Brian Entin: “The sheriff blocked the FBI — and sent DNA to Florida instead of Quantico”

February 14, 2026
Next Post

What Georgia Ballot Decision Could Mean for Donald Trump: Analysts

NATO secretary general warns about Putin threats on NATO over Ukraine

Please login to join discussion
Misleading

Misleading is your trusted source for uncovering fake news, analyzing misinformation, and educating readers about deceptive media tactics. Join the fight for truth today!

TRENDING

“Anchor It”, It’s Misleading To Think You Don’t Have To Anchor Your TV’s And Furniture

LATEST

“Anchor It”, It’s Misleading To Think You Don’t Have To Anchor Your TV’s And Furniture

That Viral CEO Big Arch Bite: A Masterclass in Trying Not to Mislead While Looking Uninspired

Vince McMahon Crash Footage Goes Viral, but the Misleading Commentary Goes Nuclear

  • About Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Misleading.
Misleading is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • About Us
  • Log in
  • Don’t Mislead (Archive)
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Misleading.
Misleading is not responsible for the content of external sites.