Misleading
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
Misleading
  • About Us
  • Log in
  • Don’t Mislead (Archive)
  • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
Misleading
No Result
View All Result

NFL Upset Picks: Target These Underdogs for NFL Week 6 Betting Slate

October 11, 2024
in Missleading
Reading Time: 5 mins read
0 0
A A
0
College Football Predictions: 2024 Conference Champions, Heisman Winner
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

This NFL season has been unique in the amount of heavy underdogs that have not just covered, but won straight up.

This continued last week when the Cardinals, as an underdog of more than a touchdown, beat the 49ers. The Giants accomplished this as well, defeating Seattle as 6.5-point underdogs.

Overall, NFL underdogs of 5.5 or more points are 19-4-1 against the spread through five weeks, including 13 outright victories. Here is how the biggest underdogs have performed each week, according to sports betting analyst Ben Fawkes:

  • Week 1: 3-1 ATS
  • Week 2: 6-0 ATS
  • Week 3: 5-1 ATS
  • Week 4: 3-2-1 ATS

With that in mind, here are our favorite underdog predictions for the NFL Week 6 slate.

Commanders +6.5 (-105) ESPN BET

Washington Commanders vs. Baltimore Ravens, 1 p.m. ET

It is hard to come to terms with the reality that the Commanders might have the best offense in the NFL. They should not be underdogs by a touchdown against anybody in today’s NFL.

Rookie QB Jaylen Daniels has been a revelation for this team, which has proven over the course of five weeks that it can score on anybody.

BET $5, GET $200 BONUS BETS

DRAFTKINGS SPORTSBOOK

$1,000 FIRST BET RESET (MUST USE CODE NEWSWEEK)

ESPN BET

UP TO $1,000 BONUS BETS

FANATICS SPORTSBOOK

$1,500 FIRST-BET OFFER

BETMGM

$200 BONUS OR $1,000 FIRST-BET SAFETY NET

BET365

$1,000 FIRST BET

CAESARS SPORTSBOOK

BET $5, WIN $300 BONUS BETS

FANDUEL SPORTSBOOK

According to DVOA, the Commanders have the fourth-best offense in the NFL, with the fourth-best passing and rushing offense.

While yes, they have faced the sixth-easiest schedule of opposing defenses, according to DVOA, they have not only performed well, but dominated. They also have the best offensive EPA (expected points added) in the league (No. 1 in passing EPA; No. 2 in rushing EPA).

After scoring 20 and 21 points in Weeks 1 and 2, respectively, they have exploded the past three weeks, with 38 points against the Bengals, 42 against the Cardinals and 34 against the Browns.

The Ravens are a tough test, without a doubt, but this Baltimore defense has been leaky this year, giving us more confidence that, at the very least, the Commanders should be able to keep up.

The Ravens have allowed the most passing yards per game in the NFL, allowing their opponents to throw for an average of 304 yards per game.

So, the guess here is that this is going to be a high-scoring affair (the over could be a look, too), with the Commanders able to keep this within a touchdown.

Commanders +6.5 (-105): 1 Unit

Giants +3.5 (-115) BetMGM

Cincinnati Bengals vs. New York Giants, 8:20 p.m. ET

Until we see this Bengals team show that it is capable of getting stops, it is close to an auto-fade each week — especially going up against a Giants team that is still undervalued.

After an inept offensive performance in Week 1, the Giants have quietly put together a nice stretch of games on offense over the past month. Their point totals do not quite reflect that, as they have had red zone issues, but they have been able to move the ball up and down the field.

They play at a slow pace (they average 28.4 seconds per snap, ninth-most in NFL), with the ninth-slowest adjusted pace as well. Due to this, the Giants have the third-highest time of possession in the NFL.

This was evident last Sunday in New York’s victory over the Seahawks, when it held the ball for over 37 minutes.

Getting stops has been an issue for this Bengals defense. Cincinnati has the third-worst defensive EPA and 22nd-ranked defensive DVOA, and it has allowed at least 24 points in each of its last four games.

The Bengals gave up 38 points in a loss to the Commanders in which they did not force a single punt, and they allowed 41 points in a loss to the Ravens last week.

The Bengals offense has been great, but it has not helped translate to victories, as the defense has been incapable of getting stops.

This has the makings of a game where the Giants hold the ball for the majority of the night thanks to their ability to keep long drives going, keeping the Bengals offense off the field.

Giants +3.5 (-115): 1 Unit

Jets Moneyline (+120) Bet365

Buffalo Bills vs. New York Jets, Monday, Oct. 14, 8:15 p.m. ET

This play here is a tried and true NFL betting strategy, which is betting on a team the week after it fires its head coach.

According to Sportico, there have been 37 occasions since 2000 where a team’s head coach has either resigned or been fired during the regular season. Prior to the coach leaving, those teams had a win percentage of 27 percent. In the first game after the firing, those teams won 43 percent of those games.

That number does not seem incredible, but a 16 percent increase in win rate is much more meaningful.

Along with this being a system play, fading the Bills is also a good proposition given how they have performed the last couple weeks.

They were riding high after a 3-0 start, but have now lost two straight in ugly fashion. They got blown out by Ravens two weeks ago, 35-10, and last Sunday’s loss to the Texans was not as close as the final score might lead you to believe.

The Bills were out-gained 425 yards to 276, and Josh Allen was 9-for-30 passing. Late turnovers from the Texans made that game closer than it should have been, but the Bills were thoroughly outplayed.

The Jets are a team that we are still not high on for the rest of the season, but for one week, they have the right situation to upset the Bills.

Jets moneyline (+120): 1 Unit

Newsweek may earn an affiliate commission if you sign up through the links in this article. See the sportsbook operator’s terms and conditions for important details. Sports betting operators have no influence over newsroom coverage.

Previous Post

Cooling Inflation Points to Slowing in Price Pressures

Next Post

It’s Time to Either Fix Lebanon—Or Break It Up | Opinion

Related Posts

Missleading

Does the 1948 Smith-Mundt Act make news broadcasters liable for ‘lying?’ on social media? That’s incorrect

September 18, 2025
Charlie Kirk’s Real Take on Netanyahu Will Shock You
Don’t Mislead

Charlie Kirk’s Real Take on Netanyahu Will Shock You

September 17, 2025
Missleading

The database of vaccine deaths and side effects is based on unverified reports, and Trump officials and right-wing journalists are misinterpreting it.

September 17, 2025
Trump Nominates Matt Gaetz For Attorney General
Missleading

“Big Win For Justice And Law” – Trump Celebrates Big Court Ruling In Election Case

September 17, 2025
Boy Scouts Rebranded. Girl Scouts Reaffirmed. Are Our Institutions Evolving—or Just Playing Identity Politics?
Don’t Mislead

Boy Scouts Rebranded. Girl Scouts Reaffirmed. Are Our Institutions Evolving—or Just Playing Identity Politics?

September 16, 2025
Trump Nominates Matt Gaetz For Attorney General
Missleading

Trump sues New York Times for $15 Billion – “Virtual mouthpiece for the radical left Democrat Party”.

September 16, 2025
Next Post
It’s Time to Either Fix Lebanon—Or Break It Up | Opinion

It's Time to Either Fix Lebanon—Or Break It Up | Opinion

How Much Money Has Taylor Swift Donated To Charity This Year? What We Know

How Much Money Has Taylor Swift Donated To Charity This Year? What We Know

Please login to join discussion
Misleading

Misleading is your trusted source for uncovering fake news, analyzing misinformation, and educating readers about deceptive media tactics. Join the fight for truth today!

TRENDING

Boy Scouts Rebranded. Girl Scouts Reaffirmed. Are Our Institutions Evolving—or Just Playing Identity Politics?

Charlie Kirk Spoke. The Press Twisted. Dowd Spoke. MSNBC Fired. Who’s Really Misleading? 

From Debate to Tragedy: UVU Student Hunter Kozak Confronts Charlie Kirk, Then Confronts Himself

LATEST

Does the 1948 Smith-Mundt Act make news broadcasters liable for ‘lying?’ on social media? That’s incorrect

Charlie Kirk’s Real Take on Netanyahu Will Shock You

The database of vaccine deaths and side effects is based on unverified reports, and Trump officials and right-wing journalists are misinterpreting it.

  • About Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Misleading.
Misleading is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • About Us
  • Log in
  • Don’t Mislead (Archive)
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Misleading.
Misleading is not responsible for the content of external sites.