Misleading
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
Misleading
  • About Us
  • Log in
  • Don’t Mislead (Archive)
  • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
Misleading
No Result
View All Result

Supreme Court won’t take up challenge to landmark defamation case

March 24, 2025
in Missleading
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0 0
A A
0
Supreme Court won’t take up challenge to landmark defamation case
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Louisiana districts Supreme Court case

Supreme Court hearing arguments on Louisiana redistricting fight

03:11

Washington — The Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a case brought by casino mogul and Trump donor Steve Wynn that would have challenged a landmark decision that established a higher standard for public figures to successfully sue for defamation. 

The Supreme Court on Monday formally declined to consider 83-year-old Wynn’s request to revisit the court’s decision in a case known as New York Times Company v. Sullivan as a part of Wynn’s legal battle against the Associated Press. 

The unanimous 1964 Supreme Court decision determined the First Amendment requires a public figure to prove a defendant acted with “actual malice” and knew a statement was false or recklessly disregarded the possibility that it was false to sustain a claim of defamation. The higher standard makes it more difficult for those in the public eye to win defamation cases. First Amendment advocates see it as a fundamental pillar on modern press freedoms.

Wynn sued the AP in 2018 over its reporting about sexual misconduct allegations against him from the 1970s that were filed with law enforcement. He stepped down from his position as chief executive of Wynn Resorts, which he founded, in 2018, after the Wall Street Journal published sexual misconduct allegations. Wynn also stepped down from his role as the finance chairman for the Republican National Committee. Wynn has consistently denied any allegations of misconduct. 

The New York Times v. Sullivan case came about after the newspaper published an ad soliciting donations to defend Martin Luther King Jr. on perjury charges. The ad contained some factual inaccuracies. Lester Sullivan, commissioner of public safety in Montgomery, Alabama, filed a libel action when the Times declined to publicly retract the information. All nine justices on the Supreme Court eventually agreed to overturn an Alabama court’s decision and solidify protections for press coverage.

The decision in the case has been targeted by some conservatives in recent years, and at least two sitting justices — Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch — have said the court should revisit the ruling. 

“New York Times and the court’s decisions extending it were policy-driven decisions masquerading as constitutional law,” Thomas wrote in a 2019 opinion. “If the Constitution does not require public figures to satisfy an actual-malice standard in state-law defamation suits, then neither should we.”

Melissa Quinn and

Jacob Rosen

contributed to this report.

Kathryn Watson

Kathryn Watson is a politics reporter for CBS News Digital, based in Washington, D.C.

Previous Post

Stocks jump amid signs Trump could scale back tariffs

Next Post

Trump asks Supreme Court to pause reinstatement of some workers

Related Posts

Marin health officer urges quick COVID vaccination – Marin Independent Journal
Missleading

Mahmoud Khalil’s new legal filing responds to grotesque charges, saying that his arrest caused ‘irreparable damage’ – NBC News

June 6, 2025
Marin health officer urges quick COVID vaccination – Marin Independent Journal
Missleading

Marin health officer urges quick COVID vaccination – Marin Independent Journal

June 5, 2025
Why is the Autopen Significant? Let’s start with a History Lesson on it’s Legitimacy and it’s Liabilities
Don’t Mislead

Why is the Autopen Significant? Let’s start with a History Lesson on it’s Legitimacy and it’s Liabilities

June 4, 2025
Missleading

Google’s search for cancer information leads to ads targeted by alternative clinics

June 4, 2025
Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) is a form of Point-of-Purchase Credit, Dangerous Fad or Healthier Smarter form of Credit?
Don’t Mislead

Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) is a form of Point-of-Purchase Credit, Dangerous Fad or Healthier Smarter form of Credit?

June 3, 2025
Not All Peptides are Good For Everyone
Don’t Mislead

Not All Peptides are Good For Everyone

June 3, 2025
Next Post
Trump asks Supreme Court to pause reinstatement of some workers

Trump asks Supreme Court to pause reinstatement of some workers

Top Trump officials included journalist in group chat about bombing Yemen

Top Trump officials included journalist in group chat about bombing Yemen

Please login to join discussion
Misleading

Misleading is your trusted source for uncovering fake news, analyzing misinformation, and educating readers about deceptive media tactics. Join the fight for truth today!

TRENDING

Mahmoud Khalil’s new legal filing responds to grotesque charges, saying that his arrest caused ‘irreparable damage’ – NBC News

Google’s search for cancer information leads to ads targeted by alternative clinics

Not All Peptides are Good For Everyone

LATEST

Mahmoud Khalil’s new legal filing responds to grotesque charges, saying that his arrest caused ‘irreparable damage’ – NBC News

Marin health officer urges quick COVID vaccination – Marin Independent Journal

Why is the Autopen Significant? Let’s start with a History Lesson on it’s Legitimacy and it’s Liabilities

  • About Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Misleading.
Misleading is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • About Us
  • Log in
  • Don’t Mislead (Archive)
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Misleading.
Misleading is not responsible for the content of external sites.