Misleading
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
Misleading
  • About Us
  • Log in
  • Don’t Mislead (Archive)
  • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
Misleading
No Result
View All Result

Who were the 2024 election’s “crypto voters”?

December 9, 2024
in Missleading
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0 0
A A
0
Who were the 2024 election’s “crypto voters”?
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

In last month’s election, one of the biggest winners was not on the ballot — it was in a crypto wallet.

During the 2024 campaign cycle, cryptocurrency companies contributed one-third of all direct corporate contributions to super PACs, or political action committees. And it paid off: 85% of the congressional candidates supported by the industry won their races. 

One crypto executive told 60 Minutes the success was not just because of the enormous amount of money the industry spent on ads. It was also because people they described as “crypto voters” turned out to cast their ballots.

“I think those who don’t believe there are passionate people about crypto are not paying attention to how significant this industry is already, today,” said Brad Garlinghouse, the CEO of Ripple, whose cryptocurrency XRP is one of the largest in the world.

Cryptocurrencies are digital assets that are not controlled by a country or financial institution. They run on a blockchain, a secure, decentralized virtual ledger that keeps track of every transaction.

Industry research shows that people who own cryptocurrency tend to be young, racially diverse, and see cryptocurrency as a way to gain more freedom over their financial lives. Overall, they agree that the industry needs clearer regulations and want candidates who are open to emerging technologies.

The voter base is growing and, apparently, up for grabs: While they support policies favorable to the industry, cypto voters don’t have a unified position on which party will best deliver them. Most industry research shows crypto owners are at an almost even split between support for the Republican and Democratic parties.

To help them make sense of which candidate to back, the advocacy organization Stand With Crypto assigns politicians grades based on statements they’ve made about the industry.

President-elect Donald Trump received an A grade. After calling bitcoin “a scam,” in 2021, Trump has since embraced the industry. In September, he announced his new cryptocurrency business, a new crypto platform called World Liberty Financial. This week, Trump announced he will appoint former PayPal Chief Operating Officer David Sacks as his “White House A.I. & Crypto Czar,” a move that highlights Trump’s desire to boost the crypto industry.

John Reed Stark, a former chief of internet enforcement at the Securities and Exchange Commission, is critical of crypto. He told 60 Minutes he owns no cryptocurrency but understands those who do.

“They have a mammoth distrust of financial institutions. And they love the edginess of the culture,” Stark said. “And I think those people do vote. And I think that’s another aspect of where these crypto PACs just executed a brilliant strategy, because they really tapped into that.”

Stark said the appeal of cryptocurrency traces back to the financial crisis and the lack of trust in institutions. But he maintains that cryptocurrency is dangerous.

“I think it’s fair to say, ‘I don’t trust institutions.’ I don’t either,” Stark said. “But that doesn’t mean let’s put a worse one in place.”

Whether or not voters knew the ins and outs of crypto is up for debate. The industry was not overt in making a crypto connection in its ads, regardless if they were for or against a candidate.

For example, Democrat Rep. Katie Porter in California had criticized cryptocurrency mining in a letter she co-signed with Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a known crypto skeptic. When Porter then ran for Senate during this year’s primary, every negative ad attacking her was funded by crypto, according to the Washington Post. Some of those ads simply called her a “a fake,” a “liar” and a “bully.”

Overall in this year’s election, the crypto industry backed 29 Republicans and 33 Democrats. The biggest crypto industry super PAC that financed these candidates is called Fairshake, which was started, in part, by Ripple.

Fairshake spent $131 million on ads supporting pro-crypto candidates this election cycle, and it already has another $103 million to spend on pro-crypto candidates in the mid-term elections in two years. But none of the television ads that Fairshake put out and paid for this year mentioned crypto, including those against Porter.

Ripple CEO Garlinghouse told 60 Minutes that, even if Fairshake did not directly mention crypto, the commercials were still educating voters.

Stark was not so sure. “All of these elected officials were very clear in their supporting of crypto,” he said. “Whether people understood that or not, I don’t know.”

The video above was produced by Brit McCandless Farmer and edited by Scott Rosann. 

Brit McCandless Farmer

Brit McCandless Farmer is a digital producer for 60 Minutes, where her work has been recognized by the Webby, Gracie, and Telly Awards. Previously, Brit worked at the CBS Weekend Evening News, CBS This Morning, CNN, and ABC News.

Previous Post

Sal Khan wants an AI tutor for every student

Next Post

Jay-Z, Sean “Diddy” Combs accused of raping 13-year-old in civil suit

Related Posts

Missleading

FTC sends more than $2 million to consumers who were harmed by scammers offering bogus money-making and coaching programs

June 18, 2025
Trump Nominates Matt Gaetz For Attorney General
Missleading

Trump Rejects Iran Report

June 17, 2025
Missleading

Australians are misinformed by influencers, according to a new study

June 17, 2025
Missleading

Mike Lee – Sen. Mike Lee’s evidence-free, conspiracy theory that the MN Shooter was a ‘Marxist’ is Pants on Fire

June 17, 2025
Synthetic Fertilizer, EPA Tries to Manage Substantial Environmental Impacts, FDA does not Regulate, Consumers Have No Way of Knowing
Don’t Mislead

Synthetic Fertilizer, EPA Tries to Manage Substantial Environmental Impacts, FDA does not Regulate, Consumers Have No Way of Knowing

June 16, 2025
Missleading

Facebook posts: Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce didn’t attend a rally for ‘No Kings,’ contrary to a fake story. Photo

June 16, 2025
Next Post
Jay-Z, Sean “Diddy” Combs accused of raping 13-year-old in civil suit

Jay-Z, Sean "Diddy" Combs accused of raping 13-year-old in civil suit

12/8/2024: Boeing’s Whistleblowers; Big Crypto; A Tutor for Every Student; Thai Elephants

12/8/2024: Boeing's Whistleblowers; Big Crypto; A Tutor for Every Student; Thai Elephants

Please login to join discussion
Misleading

Misleading is your trusted source for uncovering fake news, analyzing misinformation, and educating readers about deceptive media tactics. Join the fight for truth today!

TRENDING

Craigslist Ad for Big and Fit Badass People to Join a Mysterious Crew has been found to be a Prank

Watch the Grand Military Parade on the 250th Anniversary of the U.S. Army

GM Investing $4 Billion In US

LATEST

FTC sends more than $2 million to consumers who were harmed by scammers offering bogus money-making and coaching programs

Trump Rejects Iran Report

Australians are misinformed by influencers, according to a new study

  • About Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Misleading.
Misleading is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • About Us
  • Log in
  • Don’t Mislead (Archive)
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Misleading.
Misleading is not responsible for the content of external sites.