Misleading
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
Misleading
  • About Us
  • Log in
  • Don’t Mislead (Archive)
  • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
Misleading
No Result
View All Result

Toll School Lunch Fees Taking on Parents Revealed

September 11, 2024
in Missleading
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0 0
A A
0
Toll School Lunch Fees Taking on Parents Revealed
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Parents are being charged transaction fees when paying for their children’s lunch fees, a new report has revealed.

As more schools turn to cashless payment systems, more districts have contracted with processing companies that charge as much as $3.25 or 4% to 5% per transaction, according to a new report from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Schools must legally offer a fee-free option to pay by cash or check, but the report found there’s rarely transparency around it.

In its review of the 300 largest public school districts in the U.S., the CFPB found that 87% of sampled districts used payment processors, and the average company charged an average of $2.37 or 4.4% of the total transaction.

Rebecca Wood
Rebecca Wood stands for a portrait outside her home, Friday, Aug. 30, 2024, in Maynard, Mass. Wood noticed a “program fee” required each time she loaded money onto her daughter’s school lunch account.
Rebecca Wood stands for a portrait outside her home, Friday, Aug. 30, 2024, in Maynard, Mass. Wood noticed a “program fee” required each time she loaded money onto her daughter’s school lunch account.
Charles Krupa/AP

The fees disproportionately affect families with lower incomes who can’t afford to load large sums in one go, and these may hit weekly or even more frequently.

This means that families that qualify for free or reduced lunch pay end up paying as much as 60 cents per dollar in fees when paying for school lunches electronically, according to the report.

Rebecca Wood, 45, noticed she was being charged a $2.49 “program fee” each time she loaded money onto her daughter’s school lunch account in 2020.

The single mother was already dealing with high medical bills.

“It wouldn’t have been a big deal if I had hundreds of dollars to dump into her account at the beginning of the year,” Wood said.

“I didn’t. I was paying as I went, which meant I was paying a fee every time. The $2.50 transaction fee was the price of a lunch. So I’d pay for six lunches, but only get five.”

“They take money from people who need it the most,” said Wood.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture has mandated that districts inform families of their options since 2017.

But even when parents are aware, having to pay by cash or check to avoid fees can be extra work.

“It’s just massively inconvenient,” said Joanna Roa, 43, who works at Clemson University in South Carolina as a library specialist and has two school-aged children.

Roa said that she switched her son to pack lunches when she saw the $3.25-per-transaction fee for lunch account transactions.

“A dollar here and there, I expected,” she said. “But $3.25 per transaction, especially here in rural South Carolina where the cost of living is a lot lower—as are the salaries—is a lot.”

Roa said packing lunch for two kids every day was an increased burden of time and effort.

Payment companies maintain that school districts have the chance to negotiate fees and rates when they form their contracts.

However the CFPB found that complex company structures “may insulate companies from competition and make school districts less likely to negotiate.”

Just three companies—MySchoolBucks, SchoolCafe, and LINQ Connect—dominate the market, according to the report.

Without the ability to choose which company to work with, “families have fewer ways to avoid harmful practices,” the agency said, “including those that may violate federal consumer protection law.”

Newsweek emailed the companies named in the report for comment on Wednesday.

This article includes reporting from The Associated Press

Previous Post

First General Election Ballots Mailed as Presidential Race Nears

Next Post

More Women Getting Tubes Tied in States With Abortion Bans

Related Posts

“Anchor It”, It’s Misleading To Think You Don’t Have To Anchor Your TV’s And Furniture
Don’t Mislead

“Anchor It”, It’s Misleading To Think You Don’t Have To Anchor Your TV’s And Furniture

March 16, 2026
That Viral CEO Big Arch Bite: A Masterclass in Trying Not to Mislead While Looking Uninspired
Don’t Mislead

That Viral CEO Big Arch Bite: A Masterclass in Trying Not to Mislead While Looking Uninspired

March 6, 2026
Vince McMahon Crash Footage Goes Viral, but the Misleading Commentary Goes Nuclear
Don’t Mislead

Vince McMahon Crash Footage Goes Viral, but the Misleading Commentary Goes Nuclear

March 1, 2026
Chuck Todd explains the FCC’s Equal‑Time Rule — and why the new media economy runs on grievances, not airtime.
Don’t Mislead

Chuck Todd explains the FCC’s Equal‑Time Rule — and why the new media economy runs on grievances, not airtime.

February 20, 2026
Dr. Hillary Cass — Social Media Is Over‑Labeling Kids Before They Even Understand Themselves
Don’t Mislead

Dr. Hillary Cass — Social Media Is Over‑Labeling Kids Before They Even Understand Themselves

February 19, 2026
Brian Entin: “The sheriff blocked the FBI — and sent DNA to Florida instead of Quantico”
Don’t Mislead

Brian Entin: “The sheriff blocked the FBI — and sent DNA to Florida instead of Quantico”

February 14, 2026
Next Post
More Women Getting Tubes Tied in States With Abortion Bans

More Women Getting Tubes Tied in States With Abortion Bans

Voters discuss Trump's comments on 2020 election, Harris' fracking stance

Please login to join discussion
Misleading

Misleading is your trusted source for uncovering fake news, analyzing misinformation, and educating readers about deceptive media tactics. Join the fight for truth today!

TRENDING

No Content Available

LATEST

“Anchor It”, It’s Misleading To Think You Don’t Have To Anchor Your TV’s And Furniture

That Viral CEO Big Arch Bite: A Masterclass in Trying Not to Mislead While Looking Uninspired

Vince McMahon Crash Footage Goes Viral, but the Misleading Commentary Goes Nuclear

  • About Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Misleading.
Misleading is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • About Us
  • Log in
  • Don’t Mislead (Archive)
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Misleading.
Misleading is not responsible for the content of external sites.