Misleading
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
Misleading
  • About Us
  • Log in
  • Don’t Mislead (Archive)
  • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
Misleading
No Result
View All Result

These three climate misinformation campaigns will be active during the run-up to the elections. How to identify them

April 22, 2025
in Missleading
Reading Time: 5 mins read
0 0
A A
0
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The federal election campaign is dominated by Australia’s energy and climate wars. Major parties have outlined radically different plans for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and tackling soaring electricity prices.

During the campaign, false and misleading statements about renewable energy, natural gas, and global warming have been a part of the public discourse.

This is a very dangerous situation. For decades, misinformation in Australia and around the world has slowed down climate action. It creates doubt, hampers decision-making, and undermines public support for solutions.

We explain the history of climate deception in Australia, and we identify three campaigns that are currently active. We will also explain how Australians can guard themselves against misinformation when they go to the polls.

Misinformation vs disinformation

False information is misinformation, which is false information that spreads unintentionally. Misinformation is different from disinformation which is intentionally created to deceive.

It can be difficult to prove intent. The term misinformation can be used to describe any misleading content. However, disinformation should only be used when intent has been proven.

Disinformation is usually part of a coordinated public opinion campaign. These campaigns are often run by corporations, political groups or lobbying organizations.

These false narratives can be taken up by others who will spread them and create misinformation.

Climate change misinformation in Australia

Australia’s emission-reduction goals were among the most aggressive in the 1990s and 1980s.

Around 60 companies at the time were responsible for a third of Australia’s emissions. The government’s plan included measures that would ensure these companies remain competitive while reducing climate impact.

Australia’s resource sector launched a coordinated media campaign in opposition to any binding emission-reduction measures, claiming that it would ruin Australia’s economy by making Australian business uncompetitive.

The narrative continued even though modeling repeatedly showed policies on climate change would have minimal impacts. eventually found its way in government policies.

The momentum against climate action has also been fueled by a vocal group climate-change-denying people and organisations. They are often supported by multinational fossil fuel companies. Deniers claimed that climate change was not happening, caused by natural cycles or wasn’t a serious threat.

Media coverage of these narratives was further exacerbated due to false balanced, in which news outlets in an attempt to appear neutral often placed climate scientists next to contrarians in order for the public perception that science is still uncertain.

This created a climate in Australia that was either seen as too damaging economically or simply unnecessary.

What is happening in the federal campaign for elections?

The following types of climate misinformation have been spreading during the federal election campaign.


1. Trumpet of Patriots

Clive Palmer’s Trumpet of Patriots Party ran an ad which claimed to reveal “the truth about climate changes”. The advertisement featured a clip of a 2004 documentary in which a scientist discussed data that suggested temperatures in Greenland weren’t rising. Since then, the scientist who appeared in the video has that his comments have become outdated.

This type of misinformation involves cherry-picking, presenting a scientific measurement that is at odds with the overwhelming consensus.

Google has removed the ad after it was flagged for being misleading. However, it only did so after 1.9 million views.


2. Responsible Future Illawarra

The responsible future campaign is against wind turbines for various reasons including cost, foreign ownership and power prices.

The scientific evidence shows that offshore wind farms have a relatively low impact on marine life. They also cause less harm to the environment than fishing gear and boats . Some studies suggest that the infrastructure could create a new habitat to support marine life.

The general lack of research on offshore wind and marine wildlife has created an uncertainty that groups like Responsible Future Illawarra are able to exploit.

Sea Shepherd Australia has said that its comments have been misrepresented.

The group appears to have also deliberately spread misinformation. The group cites a supposed research paper that claims offshore wind turbines will kill up to 400 whalings each year. However, the document does not exist.

3. Australians for Natural Gas

Australians for Natural Gas, a group that promotes gas and presents itself as an organisation of grassroots members, was set up by a head of a major gas company. The campaign promotes the importance of natural gas in Australia’s fuel mix and its contribution to employment and the economy.

According to Meta’s Ad Library, these adds have already been seen more than 1.1 million times. According to Meta’s Ad Library these ads have been viewed more than 1.1 millions times.

The current Australian energy mix is dominated by gas. Analysis shows that it could be phased almost completely out if renewables and storage were increased , and business and household electrification continued to increase.

The economy of Australia will suffer a great deal if we fail to address climate change.

What to do when you find misinformation

Climate misinformation, and even disinformation, is likely to spread as the federal election draws near. How can we tell the difference between fact and fiction?

strengthen yourself against misinformation is possible by ” prebunking“. This involves familiarising yourself with the common claims of climate change deniers.

Sources like Skeptical science provide in-depth analysis of specific claims.

It is a valuable tool. It consists of four steps:

  • Stop
  • Investigate source
  • Find Better Coverage
  • Trace quotes, claims and media to original sources

A steady flow of accurate and timely information is essential to gaining public and political support in order to implement important policy changes.



Alfie is the recipient of a Research Training Program (RTP), an Australian Government Scholarship.



Libby Lester has received funding from the Australian Research Council.

Previous Post

Study finds that some politicians who spread harmful information get more clicks.

Next Post

Governor Newsom Challenges The Trump Tariffs with a Lawsuit Stating He’s Doing it for ALL CALIFORNIA RESIDENTS. Here’s One Perspective!

Related Posts

Kash Patel Makes an Apolitical Change at the FBI. Some May Think this is Political, Rethink it!
Don’t Mislead

Kash Patel Makes an Apolitical Change at the FBI. Some May Think this is Political, Rethink it!

June 9, 2025
Marin health officer urges quick COVID vaccination – Marin Independent Journal
Missleading

Mahmoud Khalil’s new legal filing responds to grotesque charges, saying that his arrest caused ‘irreparable damage’ – NBC News

June 6, 2025
Marin health officer urges quick COVID vaccination – Marin Independent Journal
Missleading

Marin health officer urges quick COVID vaccination – Marin Independent Journal

June 5, 2025
Why is the Autopen Significant? Let’s start with a History Lesson on it’s Legitimacy and it’s Liabilities
Don’t Mislead

Why is the Autopen Significant? Let’s start with a History Lesson on it’s Legitimacy and it’s Liabilities

June 4, 2025
Missleading

Google’s search for cancer information leads to ads targeted by alternative clinics

June 4, 2025
Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) is a form of Point-of-Purchase Credit, Dangerous Fad or Healthier Smarter form of Credit?
Don’t Mislead

Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) is a form of Point-of-Purchase Credit, Dangerous Fad or Healthier Smarter form of Credit?

June 3, 2025
Next Post
Governor Newsom Challenges The Trump Tariffs with a Lawsuit Stating He’s Doing it for ALL CALIFORNIA RESIDENTS.  Here’s One Perspective!

Governor Newsom Challenges The Trump Tariffs with a Lawsuit Stating He's Doing it for ALL CALIFORNIA RESIDENTS. Here's One Perspective!

The Truth About Jumping into Zero-Drop Shoes

The Truth About Jumping into Zero-Drop Shoes

Please login to join discussion
Misleading

Misleading is your trusted source for uncovering fake news, analyzing misinformation, and educating readers about deceptive media tactics. Join the fight for truth today!

TRENDING

Kash Patel Makes an Apolitical Change at the FBI. Some May Think this is Political, Rethink it!

“Cage Free” and “Free Range” Don’t Mean What You Think?

Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) is a form of Point-of-Purchase Credit, Dangerous Fad or Healthier Smarter form of Credit?

LATEST

Kash Patel Makes an Apolitical Change at the FBI. Some May Think this is Political, Rethink it!

“Cage Free” and “Free Range” Don’t Mean What You Think?

Mahmoud Khalil’s new legal filing responds to grotesque charges, saying that his arrest caused ‘irreparable damage’ – NBC News

  • About Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Misleading.
Misleading is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • About Us
  • Log in
  • Don’t Mislead (Archive)
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Misleading.
Misleading is not responsible for the content of external sites.