Misleading
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
Misleading
  • About Us
  • Log in
  • Don’t Mislead (Archive)
  • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
Misleading
No Result
View All Result

Who Will Win the Election? AI Predicts Electoral College Map

October 30, 2024
in Missleading
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0 0
A A
0
Who Will Win the Election? AI Predicts Electoral College Map
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Vice President Kamala Harris is on track to narrowly win the 2024 presidential election, according to a new analysis based on artificial intelligence (AI), with 276 Electoral College votes against 262 for Republican rival Donald Trump.

British betting company Bonus Code Bets asked ChatGPT, an AI language model developed by OpenAI, to assess which candidate would win each state based on publicly available polling information, demographics and historic election results. It concluded that Harris would win the key swing states of Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Nevada, but lose in Arizona, Georgia and North Carolina.

Recent polling suggests the 2024 presidential election remains too close to call, with a model produced by election aggregator FiveThirtyEight giving Harris a 1.4 point lead with 48.1 percent of the vote, against Trump’s 46.7 percent.

However, due to the Electoral College system, a candidate can win the popular vote but lose the election, as Hillary Clinton did in 2016, and FiveThirtyEight gives Trump a 52 percent chance of winning overall, against 48 percent for Harris.

For its analysis, Bonus Code Bets told ChatGPT to “predict how each state will vote in the 2024 presidential election, using all available information including polling information, demographics, as well as looking at previous results and relevant events in the state during the current campaign.”

The 14-vote Electoral College lead it gave Harris would be the third-closest in American history, after Rutherford B. Hayes’ 1876 victory by one vote and George W. Bush‘s 2000 defeat of Al Gore by five votes. However, if Trump wins either Pennsylvania or Michigan, with 19 and 15 Electoral College votes respectively, it would be enough to hand him victory, according to the model.

Election college map
A map produced by Bonus Code Bets showing which candidate ChatGPT thinks will win each state on November 5 based on prompts. Overall, it forecast Kamala Harris to win by 14 Electoral College votes.
A map produced by Bonus Code Bets showing which candidate ChatGPT thinks will win each state on November 5 based on prompts. Overall, it forecast Kamala Harris to win by 14 Electoral College votes.
BonusCodeBets.co.uk

Newsweek contacted representatives of the Harris and Trump presidential election campaigns for comment via email on Wednesday outside of regular office hours.

Speaking to Newsweek, a Bonus Code Bets spokesperson said: “For years, opinion polls have been used to indicate the outcome of elections, but new technology provides new ways for results to be predicted.

“And having such a powerful AI tool look at the entirety of the campaign and still predicting that Kamala Harris will win by a single state shows just how close this election will be.”

In its analysis, Bonus Code Bets emphasized the importance of the major cities to the wins it predicts for Harris in both Michigan and Pennsylvania.

Referring to ChatGPT, the company said: “In Michigan, whilst Trump is likely to hold the rural areas, which are Republican strongholds, it backs Harris to rely on key Democratic strongholds in cities like Detroit and Ann Arbor to maintain its blue shift.

“Likewise, Pennsylvania is tipped to marginally vote for Kamala despite Donald’s strong support in the Rust Belt region—relying on votes from the big cities of Pittsburgh and Philadelphia.”

Who Wins Election? AI Electoral College Map
Composite image of Kamala Harris, Donald Trump and a laptop. An analysis of the 2024 presidential election using AI concluded that Harris is on track for victory by a margin of 14 Electoral College votes….
Composite image of Kamala Harris, Donald Trump and a laptop. An analysis of the 2024 presidential election using AI concluded that Harris is on track for victory by a margin of 14 Electoral College votes.

Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty

On Tuesday President Joe Biden sparked controversy after appearing to describe Trump supporters as “garbage” in a Zoom call. However, speaking to Newsweek, White House spokesperson Andrew Bates insisted he had been referring specifically to the “hateful rhetoric coming out of the Madison Square Garden rally.”

It came after comedian Tony Hinchcliffe sparked controversy on Sunday by describing Puerto Rico as a “floating island of garbage” when speaking ahead of Trump at the former president’s Madison Square Garden rally in New York.

Despite the controversy, the odds of Trump winning on November 5 have improved over the past 24 hours, according to a number of leading bookmakers. On Tuesday both Bet365 and Paddy Power were offering odds of 1-2 (66.7 percent) on a Trump victory, but this had been cut to 10-21 (67.7 percent) and 4-9 (69.2 percent) respectively by 4 a.m. ET on Wednesday.

Previous Post

Russian Hackers Targeting U.S. Officials Ahead of Election, Microsoft Warns

Next Post

Japan’s Ban on Same-Sex Marriage Ruled Unconstitutional

Related Posts

Politics Meets FIFA: Trump Jumps In, Red Card Confusion Included
Don’t Mislead

Politics Meets FIFA: Trump Jumps In, Red Card Confusion Included

July 11, 2026
The Flamingo Revolution: How Jared Kushner’s island fantasy echoes the kind of story it’d take to build a five‑star resort on top of the Grand Canyon
Don’t Mislead

The Flamingo Revolution: How Jared Kushner’s island fantasy echoes the kind of story it’d take to build a five‑star resort on top of the Grand Canyon

July 1, 2026
Misleading: No RFP, No Competition — Now the Reflecting Pool Fix Costs Millions More
Don’t Mislead

Misleading: No RFP, No Competition — Now the Reflecting Pool Fix Costs Millions More

June 12, 2026
Watch an East Coast luxury car dealer face extortion on a One-Star Google Business Review. How Misleading can these reviews be?
Don’t Mislead

Watch an East Coast luxury car dealer face extortion on a One-Star Google Business Review. How Misleading can these reviews be?

June 1, 2026
Same Network? Sure. Same Priority? Not Even Close. Mint, Patriot & Other MVNOs Play the Misleading Game
Don’t Mislead

Same Network? Sure. Same Priority? Not Even Close. Mint, Patriot & Other MVNOs Play the Misleading Game

May 27, 2026
Controversial: Eileen Wang’s Case Becomes the Latest Battleground of ‘Who’s Really Influencing Whom
Don’t Mislead

Controversial: Eileen Wang’s Case Becomes the Latest Battleground of ‘Who’s Really Influencing Whom

May 26, 2026
Next Post
Japan’s Ban on Same-Sex Marriage Ruled Unconstitutional

Japan's Ban on Same-Sex Marriage Ruled Unconstitutional

Israel investigates Gaza airstrike that left dozens dead or missing

Please login to join discussion
Misleading

Misleading is your trusted source for uncovering fake news, analyzing misinformation, and educating readers about deceptive media tactics. Join the fight for truth today!

TRENDING

Politics Meets FIFA: Trump Jumps In, Red Card Confusion Included

LATEST

Politics Meets FIFA: Trump Jumps In, Red Card Confusion Included

The Flamingo Revolution: How Jared Kushner’s island fantasy echoes the kind of story it’d take to build a five‑star resort on top of the Grand Canyon

Misleading: No RFP, No Competition — Now the Reflecting Pool Fix Costs Millions More

  • About Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Misleading.
Misleading is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • About Us
  • Log in
  • Don’t Mislead (Archive)
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Misleading.
Misleading is not responsible for the content of external sites.