Misleading
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
Misleading
  • About Us
  • Log in
  • Don’t Mislead (Archive)
  • Privacy Policy
No Result
View All Result
Misleading
No Result
View All Result

Mariah Carey didn’t steal “All I Want For Christmas Is You,” judge says

March 21, 2025
in Missleading
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0 0
A A
0
Mariah Carey didn’t steal “All I Want For Christmas Is You,” judge says
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

A federal judge in Los Angeles has ruled that Mariah Carey did not steal her perennial megahit “All I Want for Christmas Is You” from other songwriters.

Judge Mónica Ramírez Almadani granted Carey’s request for summary judgment on Wednesday, giving her and co-writer and co-defendant Walter Afanasieff a victory without going to trial.

In 2023, songwriters Andy Stone of Louisiana — who goes by the stage name Vince Vance — and Troy Powers of Tennessee filed the $20 million lawsuit alleging that Carey’s 1994 song, which has since become a holiday standard and annual streaming sensation, infringed the copyright of their country 1989 song with the same title.

Their lawyer Gerard P. Fox said he’s “disappointed” in an email to The Associated Press.

Fox said it is his experience that judges at this level “nearly always now dismiss a music copyright case and that one must appeal to reverse and get the case to the jury. My client will make a decision shortly on whether to appeal. We filed based on the opinions of two esteemed musicologists who teach at great colleges.”

The Late Late Show with James Corden

Mariah Carey performs during “The Late Late Show with James Corden” in December 2019. 

Terence Patrick/CBS via Getty Images


Stone and Powers’ suit said their “‘All I Want For Christmas Is You’ contains a unique linguistic structure where a person, disillusioned with expensive gifts and seasonal comforts, wants to be with their loved one, and accordingly writes a letter to Santa Claus.”

They said there was an “overwhelming likelihood” Carey and Afanasieff had heard their song — which at one point reached No. 31 on Billboard’s Hot Country chart — and infringed their copyright by taking significant elements from it. Stone had claimed that the song received “extensive airplay” during the 1993 Christmas season.

After hearing from two experts for each side, Ramírez Almadani agreed with those from the defense, who said the writers employed common Christmas cliches that existed prior to both songs, and that Carey’s song used them differently. She said the plaintiffs had not met the burden of showing that the songs are substantially similar.

Ramírez Almadani also ordered sanctions against the plaintiffs and their lawyers, saying their suit and subsequent filings were frivolous and that the plaintiffs’ attorneys “made no reasonable effort to ensure that the factual contentions asserted have evidentiary support.”

She said they must pay at least part of the defendants’ attorney fees.

Defense attorneys and publicists for Carey did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Carey’s Christmas colossus has become an even bigger hit in recent years than it was in the 1990s. It has reached No. 1 on Billboard’s Hot 100 chart the past six years in a row — measuring the most popular songs each week — not just the holiday-themed — by airplay, sales and streaming. The song has broken streaming records and has been played over 2 billion times on Spotify. 

Carey and Afanasieff have had their own public disagreement — though not one that’s gone to court — over who wrote how much of the song. But the case made them at least temporary allies.

Carey previously made headlines when she tried to exclusively trademark the nickname “Queen of Christmas.” She filed a petition for the trademark in 2021. The U.S. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board rejected the petition, as well as petitions to exclusively trademark “Princess Christmas” and “QOC.” 

Last month, the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame announced Carey as one of its 2025 nominees.


More


Previous Post

DoorDash and Klarna partner to offer eat now, pay later plan

Next Post

Death on the Chazy River | Sunday on 60 Minutes

Related Posts

Kash Patel Makes an Apolitical Change at the FBI. Some May Think this is Political, Rethink it!
Don’t Mislead

Kash Patel Makes an Apolitical Change at the FBI. Some May Think this is Political, Rethink it!

June 9, 2025
Marin health officer urges quick COVID vaccination – Marin Independent Journal
Missleading

Mahmoud Khalil’s new legal filing responds to grotesque charges, saying that his arrest caused ‘irreparable damage’ – NBC News

June 6, 2025
Marin health officer urges quick COVID vaccination – Marin Independent Journal
Missleading

Marin health officer urges quick COVID vaccination – Marin Independent Journal

June 5, 2025
Why is the Autopen Significant? Let’s start with a History Lesson on it’s Legitimacy and it’s Liabilities
Don’t Mislead

Why is the Autopen Significant? Let’s start with a History Lesson on it’s Legitimacy and it’s Liabilities

June 4, 2025
Missleading

Google’s search for cancer information leads to ads targeted by alternative clinics

June 4, 2025
Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) is a form of Point-of-Purchase Credit, Dangerous Fad or Healthier Smarter form of Credit?
Don’t Mislead

Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) is a form of Point-of-Purchase Credit, Dangerous Fad or Healthier Smarter form of Credit?

June 3, 2025
Next Post
Death on the Chazy River | Sunday on 60 Minutes

Death on the Chazy River | Sunday on 60 Minutes

This week on “Sunday Morning” (March 23)

This week on "Sunday Morning" (March 23)

Please login to join discussion
Misleading

Misleading is your trusted source for uncovering fake news, analyzing misinformation, and educating readers about deceptive media tactics. Join the fight for truth today!

TRENDING

Trump calls on the GOP to pass one big beautiful bill

“Cage Free” and “Free Range” Don’t Mean What You Think?

Why is the Autopen Significant? Let’s start with a History Lesson on it’s Legitimacy and it’s Liabilities

LATEST

Kash Patel Makes an Apolitical Change at the FBI. Some May Think this is Political, Rethink it!

“Cage Free” and “Free Range” Don’t Mean What You Think?

Mahmoud Khalil’s new legal filing responds to grotesque charges, saying that his arrest caused ‘irreparable damage’ – NBC News

  • About Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Misleading.
Misleading is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • About Us
  • Log in
  • Don’t Mislead (Archive)
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 Misleading.
Misleading is not responsible for the content of external sites.